NetworkUX Coverage Checker

The most granular, fully-measured mobile coverage checker in the UK and Ireland.

Every polygon is a 10-metre hexagon. Every reading is a real measurement taken by a NetworkUX kit on the ground — not a propagation model, not a crowdsourced sample, not an operator prediction. Every map shows signal strength and data performance together, on all four UK operators simultaneously. That’s how our customers find a not-spot inside a postcode, before the network operator does.

The NetworkUX Coverage Checker showing all four UK operators — Vodafone, EE, O2 and Three — side-by-side in a 2×2 grid across the Manchester area. Each map is overlaid with thousands of small coloured hexagons showing performance bands from Very Poor (red) through to Very Good (purple).
The live Manchester Coverage Checker — all four UK operators shown together, colour-coded by data performance across the whole MCC area.
What makes ours different

Eight things you won’t find together in any other coverage checker.

Plenty of tools claim to show mobile coverage. Most of them predict it from propagation models, summarise it at 50 m or 100 m resolution, or show one operator at a time. NetworkUX is built for the opposite: granular, measured, all four operators at once.

10m hexagons

True street-level resolution

Every map cell is a 10-metre hexagon. Competitors use 50–100m cells. That’s the difference between “your borough” and “your street” — or, in many cases, your front door versus the corner.

Real measurements only

No predicted coverage. No crowdsourced data.

Every polygon comes from a real measurement taken in a real place at a real time by a NetworkUX kit. We don’t use propagation models, we don’t use operator-supplied predictions, and we don’t use opportunistic crowdsourced samples.

Signal AND performance

Both layers, always.

Every NetworkUX deployment measures signal strength (dBm) and data performance (Mbps up and down) on every operator, at every point. Toggle between the two map layers with one click.

True network speeds

Server-side time excluded.

Our upload and download tests extract the server-side processing time from every measurement, so the speeds you see are true network file-transfer speeds — not a blend of network speed and the remote server’s response time.

All operators side-by-side

Four maps. Same view. Same moment.

The default desktop layout shows EE, Vodafone, VMO2 and Three simultaneously in a 2×2 split. No flicking between tabs to compare; the differences jump out instantly.

5 grading bands

Selectable visibility.

Five bands from Very Poor to Very Good, each individually toggle-able. Want to see only the Very Poor cells across a council area? One tick. Want to compare Good-or-better coverage? Same. Find what matters fast.

Upload & download both required

No padding the band ratings.

To attain a band rating, both the upload and download thresholds must be met. A 50 Mbps download with 0.05 Mbps upload is not “Very Good” in our scheme — it’s Very Poor on the upload side, and the band reflects the weaker number.

Transparency slider

See street names under the polygons.

Need to read a specific street name through the colour layer? Drag the contrast slider to lighten the polygons. Want a starker visualisation for a council meeting? Slide the other way. Live, in the browser, no settings menus.

10 metres, not 100

This is what the difference looks like at street level.

A live screenshot from the NetworkUX Coverage Checker, zoomed into the School Grove area of Manchester in Performance mode on Vodafone. Each hexagon is a single 10-metre cell, coloured by the actual download and upload speeds we measured there. Mobile performance — what users actually feel when they open an app — varies street-by-street and even building-by-building. A 100 m grid averages five bands of real-world experience into one colour. NetworkUX doesn’t.

A close-up of the NetworkUX Coverage Checker showing Vodafone data performance across the School Grove residential area in Manchester. The 5-band legend is visible across the top, with the Performance/Signal toggle set to Performance and the address search showing 'School Grove, Manchester, UK'. Every street is covered by a continuous chain of 10-metre hexagons in five colours from Very Poor (red) through Poor, Fair and Good to Very Good (purple). Side-streets and individual houses are clearly resolved.
School Grove, Manchester — Vodafone performance at 10-metre hexagon resolution. The address search bar shows the exact area in view.
Same streets, four networks, one screen

The side-by-side view that no other checker offers.

The same School Grove area shown above — this time with all four UK operators rendered simultaneously in the default 4-up view. Vodafone, EE, O2 and Three each tested by the same kit, on the same routes, at the same time. The differences between operators on the same residential streets are instantly visible. You don’t switch tabs to compare; the comparison is the view.

The NetworkUX Coverage Checker 4-up view showing the same Manchester School Grove residential area on all four UK operators at street-level zoom. Vodafone (top-left) and EE (top-right) show predominantly mid-band performance with patches of poor cells; O2 (bottom-left) and Three (bottom-right) show heavily favourable purple Very Good performance across the same streets. The address search bar shows School Grove, Manchester, UK.
School Grove, Manchester — all four operators, same view, same time. On these residential streets, O2 and Three deliver Very Good performance across nearly every hexagon; Vodafone and EE deliver a mix of bands. That difference is the kind of granular operator-comparison NetworkUX customers act on every day.
Performance bands

Five bands, mapped to what people actually do on their phone.

Mobile data is only useful in the context of what it can do. Every NetworkUX Coverage Checker labels each band with the kinds of services it enables — from basic messaging at the bottom end through to 4K video and cloud gaming at the top. Both the upload and download thresholds must be met to attain a band; a fast download with a slow upload is rated by the weaker of the two.

Very Poor
Download: Less than 0.5 Mbps
Upload: Less than 0.1 Mbps
Basic messaging · Email (no attachments)
Poor
Download: 0.5–1 Mbps
Upload: 0.1–0.5 Mbps
Browsing static sites · Online shopping
Fair
Download: 1–5 Mbps
Upload: 0.5–1 Mbps
Social media · YouTube (standard definition)
Good
Download: 5–10 Mbps
Upload: 1–2 Mbps
HD streaming · Video calling
Very Good
Download: Over 10 Mbps
Upload: Over 2 Mbps
4K video · Cloud gaming

Services cascade down the bands. A reading of Good enables HD streaming and video calls, plus everything the Fair, Poor and Very Poor bands enable.

Signal bands

And the same colour system on the signal-strength side.

Mobile signal strength is technically measured in decibel-milliwatts (dBm), but most people read it as bars on the phone. The five NetworkUX signal bands map both ways — from no bars at the bottom (worse than −120 dBm) to four-bar signal at the top (better than −85 dBm).

Very Poor
dBm: Worse than −120 dBm
No bars — weak or no signal
Poor
dBm: −120 to −105 dBm
One bar — intermittent service
Fair
dBm: −105 to −95 dBm
Two bars — usable for calls
Good
dBm: −95 to −85 dBm
Three bars — usable for data
Very Good
dBm: Better than −85 dBm
Four+ bars — very strong signal

A useful pattern to look for: areas with Good or Very Good signal but Poor or Very Poor performance. That’s a capacity (congestion) problem, not a coverage problem — common in urban areas at busy times. The NetworkUX Coverage Checker is one of the only tools that lets you spot this directly.

How we compare

NetworkUX versus the other tools your buyers might be looking at.

Three other categories of coverage checker exist in the UK: Streetwave (similar bin-lorry-based methodology), Ofcom’s “Map Your Mobile” (the regulator’s public-facing tool), and the operators’ own checkers (EE, Vodafone, O2, Three). Each has a place. Here’s a like-for-like comparison on the dimensions that affect the answers you can give your buyer.

Feature NetworkUX Streetwave Ofcom MYM MNO checkers
Resolution / display model 10 m hexagons (H3 res 12) Aggregated to street segments / per address 50 m (100 m Vodafone) ~100 m or coarser
Data source Real measurements only Real measurements Predicted + crowdsourced Predicted only
Signal strength (dBm) Yes, every point Yes Yes (predicted) Coarse band only
Data performance (Mbps) Yes, every point Yes Limited No (signal only)
Server-side time excluded from speeds Yes Not stated N/A N/A
All 4 UK operators side-by-side Yes, 4-up split view One at a time One at a time Single operator only
Selectable / toggleable bands Yes, per band Not stated No No
Polygon transparency control Yes, live slider Not stated No No
Independent of operators Yes Yes Operator-supplied predictions Operator self-report

Streetwave is the closest equivalent to NetworkUX in data collection methodology — both companies use bin-lorry-hosted kits gathering real measurements. The difference is in how the data is displayed. NetworkUX renders every measurement on a continuous grid of 10 m hexagons (H3 resolution 12), showing coverage on every street, junction, square and gap between buildings. Streetwave’s public methodology describes an address-aggregated model: data is rolled up to the street where the residential address is found, with each address assigned a Streetwave Speed Score. For pinpointing not-spots between addresses, planning infrastructure on routes rather than at door numbers, or scoping EV-charge sites and event walking routes, the hexagon grid gives you the answer at the resolution the question actually needs.

Ofcom’s Map Your Mobile uses operator-supplied predicted coverage with crowdsourced data from Opensignal layered on top; it’s a useful national overview but isn’t built for street-level decisions. Operator checkers are predictions of the operator’s own coverage at coarse resolution — useful as a baseline, but not as a measure of what residents and visitors actually experience.

Comparison data: the claims in the table above were sourced from the public-facing pages and methodology documents of each provider on 26 May 2026. Coverage-checker products evolve; specific features may have changed since. The defensibility document accompanying this comparison — with the screenshots, timestamps and source URLs used to derive each row — is available on request from info@inakalum.com.

In their words

What council customers say after the data lands on the table.

Four direct quotes from three live UK council programmes — Westminster City Council, Manchester City Council and the Tees Valley Combined Authority (plus one of its constituent councils).

“The conversation with mobile-network operators has moved on a lot more. We know where the problem areas are. We can be constructive and collaborative about how we might be able to help them — our aim is to improve the user and visitor experience of people coming to Westminster.”
David Wilkins
Head of Smart City, Westminster City Council
See the Westminster case study
“Overall, the experience of working with the team at NetworkUX and the product delivered was exceptional in quality and delivery. I would recommend NetworkUX to any party interested in gathering data on mobile capacity.”
Megan Lawless
Senior Digital Strategy Officer, Manchester City Council
See the Manchester case study
“Ever wondered why your apps won’t load despite full bars on your phone? That’s exactly what our new Mobile Performance Map is here to solve. It’s already highlighting where coverage is strong — and where it needs to improve — so we can work with providers to fill the gaps and make sure people get the service they pay for.”
Ben Houchen
Tees Valley Mayor
See the Tees Valley case study
“We’re using our bin wagons to sort more than just our rubbish — we’re sorting rubbish signal out, too. No more guesswork — this will give us hard evidence of problems people who have poor signal know only too well, and arm us to go to providers and government to get it sorted.”
Cllr Steve Harker
Leader, Darlington Borough Council
See the Tees Valley case study
See it in two clicks

The same dataset, the same controls, on two live council areas.

Both checkers are public. Click around, switch between Performance and Signal, toggle bands on and off, drag the transparency slider, search a postcode. What you see is what every Inakalum customer gets — just scoped to their area.

Who uses it

The Coverage Checker is the public-facing layer. The survey is the evidence.

Behind every NetworkUX Coverage Checker is a multi-week or multi-month measurement programme. Customers commission the survey and the checker together — the survey gives them the dataset to work from internally, the checker gives them a public-facing tool they can point residents, members, operators or funders at.

Local authorities & councils

Publish a public-facing borough or council-area checker as the headline output of a multi-week mobile-coverage programme. Used today by Manchester City Council and the Tees Valley Combined Authority.

See more — for local authorities

BIDs & place partnerships

BID-footprint connectivity data, packaged as a public-facing checker that town-centre members, levypayers and operators can all read.

See more — for BIDs & chambers

EV charge-point operators

Site-by-site verification across all four UK networks before a single charger is ordered. The checker is the public-facing layer; the survey is the evidence.

See more — for EV charge-point operators

Mobile infrastructure providers

Multi-operator field data showing exactly where capacity gaps live. Neutral hosts, tower companies and small-cell operators use the checker to build commercial cases.

See more — for mobile infrastructure
Bring NetworkUX to your area

Want a public-facing Coverage Checker for your borough, BID, estate or rail corridor?

Tell us where you want surveyed, who you’d want to share the checker with, and what question you’re trying to answer. We’ll come back with a scoping proposal — survey window, deployment model, deliverable, public checker — usually within one working day.